This report is based on a collaboration of the European Centre with the European Social Network (ESN) to examine how public procurement and quality assurance policies can improve (or decline) access to quality long-term care services.
This report summarizes the methods used to develop a governance assessment methodology, explains this framework in detail, and suggests and presents methods to perform assessments of innovations for Active and Healthy Ageing in their target contexts.
Kai Leichsenring contributed a chapter to Christian Aspalter’s ‘Ideal types in comparative social policy’ in which he applies ideal types to long-term care analysis and emerging systems in a global context.
This report provides methods to identify, categorise and prioritise domains and indicators for AHA based on a pragmatic desk review of existing multidimensional AHA policy frameworks, tools, and methods.
This report summarizes the work carried out to gather and classify AHA innovation evaluation metrics from the long list of indicators identified in Deliverable D.T2.2.1 (report on AHA impact evaluation metrics).
